Lecture: April 26 (Monday), 14:00 Prof. Dr. Gerrit Lohmann

Tutorial: April 26 (Monday), ca. 15:30 Justus Contzen, Lars Ackermann

Time required for Sheet 3: 8 h

 
 

before April 26: Watch the videos

This is based on Chapter 1 “The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics”" from Holton and Hakim (2013)

After the video: Read the script about Introduction to Atmospheric Dynamics (Chapter 1)

Reading/learning might take 60 min.

 
 

It is emphasized that the rotating frame equation of motion has some inherent awkwardness, namely the Coriolis force and the loss of Galilean invariance. However, the gain in simplicity when analyzing the motions of the atmosphere and ocean more than compensates. The reasons are several, but primarily that the inertial frame velocity consists of the solid body rotation plus the relative velocity v on the Earth, V = Ω a cos(latitude) + v, with the former being very much larger than the latter. a is earth’s radius, 6350 km, and thus Ω a ≈ O(500) m/s near the equator. This very large velocity is accelerated centripetally, and is balanced by a centripetal force associated with the ellipsoidal shape of the Earth.

The inertial frame equations have to account for all of this explicitly and yet our interest is almost always the small relative motions of the atmosphere and ocean, since it is the relative motion that transports heat and mass over the Earth. In that important regard, the velocity associated with the solid body rotation of the Earth, atmosphere and ocean is invisible, no matter how large it is. As well, when we observe the winds and ocean currents we almost always do so from a reference frame that is fixed to the Earth. Given that our goal is to solve for or observe the relative velocity, then the rotating frame equations are generally much simpler and more appropriate than are the inertial frame equations.

 
 

April 26, 14:00: Lecture 3 (online G. Lohmann, 45 min)

After the lecture: Read the script about Atmosphere and Ocean Dynamics (Chapter 3)

Reading/learning (the sections with a star are voluntary). It might take 60 min.

 

Some short videos:

Laboratory experiments showing the formation of a Taylor column, go to 2:50, other material:

vorticity and circulation

boundary layers

good introduction

Taylor column

 

After the lecture: Watch the videos ScaleAnalysis 1, ScaleAnalysis 2

This is based on Chapter 2 “The Equations of Atmospheric Dynamics”" from Holton and Hakim (2013)

After the video: Read Holton Introduction to Atmospheric Dynamics (Chapter 2)

Reading/learning might take 60 min.

 
 

April 26, ca. 15:30: Tutorial (online 45 min)

 

Exercise 3 introduced, questions to the exercise (10 min)


Exercise 1 explained (20 min)


Further stuff with RStudio (15 min)

 

Homework 1: Solve Exercise 3

This might take 3 h.

 


 

Literature:

  • Holton, J.R., and Hakim, G. J., 2013: Introduction to Dynamical Meteorology, Academic Press, Oxford (UK). —Fifth edition / Gregory J. Hakim. ISBN 978-0-12-384866-6 pdf
  • Marchal, J., Plumb, R. A., 2008. Atmosphere, Ocean and Climate Dynamics: An Introductory Text. Academic Press, 344 pp; videos pdf
  • Lohmann, G., 2020: Climate Dynamics: Concepts, Scaling and Multiple Equilibria. Lecture Notes 2020, Bremen, Germany. (pdf of Chapter 3) (pdf of the full script)
  • Stewart, R. H., 2008: Introduction To Physical Oceanography, online Version: http://oceanworld.tamu.edu/home/course_book.htm

  •